5.6 The Clausius-Clapeyron equation
Consider two phases, 1 and 2, that are in equilibrium at pressure p and temperature T.
It is known that phases in equilibrium satisfy the condition given by Eq.
(5.94):
Change the temperature of each of the phases by dT, and the pressure by dp. If
in changing the temperature we change the pressure in such a way that the two
phases continue to be in equilibrium at the new temperature T + dT, then, in the new conditions, the
potentials of the two phases will, obviously, be equal:
It is clear that the function φ (p + dp, T + dT) can be expanded in a
Taylor's series:
In accordance with Eqs. (5.34) and (5.35), we have:
and, consequently, the series (5.98) can be presented in the following
form:
Substituting this expression in the left- and right-hand sides of Eq.
(5.97), we get:
Taking into account that φ1 (p, T) = φ2 (p, T), we
obtain the equation of the phase transition boundary, or the Clausius-Clapeyron
equation:
This equation relates unambiguously the slope of the phase transition
boundary on the p-T diagram with the difference between the entropies of
the coexisting phases (s1
and s2) and the difference
between the specific volumes of these phases (v1 and v2). Since,
as we know, at a constant temperature a substance undergoes a change of phase
at equal phase pressures, i.e. the process proceeds along an isobar with the
temperatures of the two phases being equal, then, applied to the given case of p
= const, the mathematical
formulation of the second law of thermodynamics,
takes
the following form:
Integrating equation (5.103) between the limits represented by arbitrary
points 1 and 2 and taking into account that temperature T remains
constant during the change of phase, we obtain:
As applied to a phase transition process, the quantity (h2 – h1) is the difference between the enthalpies of the coexisting
phases and represents the heat of phase transition, i.e. the amount of
heat absorbed (or released) by a certain quantity of substance (usually 1 kg)
in the process of change of phase.
Denoting the heat of phase change by
we
obtain Eq. (5.104):
Substituting the value of the difference in entropies in Eq. (5.102),
the Clausius-Clapeyron equation becomes
The liquid-vapor phase change
As applied to the liquid-vapor phase change, Eq. (5.107) takes the form
where r is the heat of vaporization (latent
heat), v" the specific volume of vapor on the saturation line, v'
the specific volume of liquid on the saturation line, and ps is
the equilibrium pressure at the points of the liquid-vapor change of phase.[1]
Since the density of vapor is always less than the density of liquid, v"
> v', from Eq. (5.108) it follows that for the liquid-vapor
phase change the ratio dps/dT is always greater than
zero, i.e. saturation pressure increases with rising temperature. The
Clausius-Clapeyron equation relates the derivative of saturation pressure with
respect to temperature to the caloric (r)
and thermal (v' and v") properties of substance on the saturation line. Of
great interest are the attempts to solve the Clausius-Clapeyron equation and to
find the explicit expression for saturation pressure in relation to
temperature.
If vapor pressure is low, the value of the specific volume of vapor is
several orders of magnitudes greater than the value of the specific volume of
liquid, v" >> v', and the difference (v" - v') in the
denominator of the right-hand side of Eq. (5.108) can, therefore, be replaced
by v" with a sufficient degree of accuracy. In addition, at low vapor
pressures vapor can be regarded as a good approximation to an ideal gas, for
which, in accordance with Clapeyron's equation,
Substituting the above expression into Eq. (5.108), and carrying out
simple transformations, we obtain:
whence
Since at low temperatures the heat of vaporization is a slowly varying
function of temperature[2],
the value of r can be considered to be practically independent of
temperature in a number of cases. The value of r can then be taken out of the integral sign in Eq. (5.111), and we
get:
To determine the magnitude of the constant of Eq. (5.112), the
saturation pressure ps must be known at some fixed
temperature. The integration constant is usually determined from the standard
boiling point (or temperature) Tst.b., i.e.
on the boiling point of the liquid at standard atmospheric pressure, ps
= 760 mm Hg = 101.325 kPa, the so-called standard atmosphere. From Eq.
(5.112) we get:
Equation (5.113) is sometimes encountered in the following form:
In dealing with formula (5.114), it should be borne in mind that the
pressure ps is expressed here in standard atmospheres; in
other words, the value under the logarithm sign is a dimensionless quantity,
the ratio of the pressure at the sought point to the standard atmosphere. The
values of ps substituted into Eq. (5.114) cannot obviously be
expressed in units other than standard atmosphere, for instance, in units of
kPa, kgf/cm2, etc., since the value Tst.b. in the right-hand side of the equation represents
the boiling point of liquid at a pressure equal to one standard atmosphere. But
if Tst.b. is
replaced by the boiling point at a pressure of, for instance, 100 kPa, 1 kgf/cm2,
or 1 mm Hg, then ps in the left-hand side of this equation
must also be expressed in kPa, kgf/cm2, mm of Hg, etc.
To put differently, when the integration constant is determined not from
the value of Tst.b. but from the known saturation pressure at some
other temperature (denoted T*), Eq.
(5.112) takes the form:
From Eq. (5.112) it follows that at low pressures the dependence ln ps = f (1/T) must be linear.
The treatment of experimental data on the dependence ps versus
T for a great number of substances shows the dependence of ln ps
on 1/T to be, in fact, linear, as
illustrated in Fig. 5.5.
Fig. 5.5
One more point of interest must be mentioned. As was noted above, Eq.
(5.112) is valid only at low pressures. In this connection it would appear that
the linear nature of the dependence ln ps = f (1/T)
holds only for the low pressure region. However, the treatment of experimental
data shows that for many substances this linear dependence is also valid in the
high pressure region, where vapor cannot be regarded as an ideal gas, the
magnitude of v' should not be ignored when compared with the magnitude
of v", and where r depends substantially on temperature.
This is often taken as a surprise: Is this a new thermodynamic dependence or
not? This can be elucidated in the following manner.
Multiplying the numerator and denominator of the right-hand side of Eq. (5.108)
by p, we obtain:
and,
denoting p (v" -
v') by β we
obtain:
Since, in accordance with Eq. (5.105),
and
[see Eq. (2.47a)] we have:
i.e.
the heat of vaporization, or latent heat, can be regarded as consisting of two parts: the difference between
the internal energies of the phases
involved, (u" - u'), and the quantity p (v" - v'). The
quantity (u" - u'), sometimes called the heat
of disintegration, represents the amount of heat which must be added to a
certain quantity of substance so as to overcome the intermolecular forces in
the process of vaporization. The quantity β = p (v" - v') is obviously
the work expended to ensure expansion of the substance from the state with
specific volume v' to the state with specific volume v".[3]
Experimental data have shown that r/β
can be described with a sufficient degree of accuracy by the empirical formula
where r0
is the heat of vaporization at a temperature, and C is constant.
Substituting (5.119) into (5.116), we obtain:
The structure of Eq. (5.120) makes it similar to Eq. (5.110); the
solution of this equation leads to the linear dependence of ln ps
on 1/T.
In solving Eq. (5.110) it was assumed that since at low pressures r is a slowly varying function of
temperature, it may be considered constant. For better agreement with
experimental data, however, it often proves to be of an advantage to take into
account the dependence of the heat of vaporization on temperature, using the
simplest linear dependence
where
the constants a and b are calculated from the experimental data
on the dependence of the heat of vaporization on temperature.
Substituting (5.121) in Eq. (5.111) and solving the latter, we obtain:
whence
where ps
(T*) is the
known saturation pressure at the temperature T*.
The solid-liquid phase change
When applied to a solid-liquid phase change (melting), Eq. (5.107) can
be presented as
where λ
is the heat of fusion or heat of melting, v1 the specific volume of the liquid phase on the
melting line, and vs
is the specific volume of the solid phase on the melting line.
Since the densities of a substance in the liquid and solid phases are
quantities of the same order of magnitude, v1 and vs are usually close to each other, and two cases
are possible: (1) the density of the solid is greater than that of the liquid (v1 > vs), and (2) the density of the solid is smaller than that
of the liquid (v1
< vs). It is clear from Eq.
(5.124) that for the first case dp/dT > 0, i.e. the fusion point
rises with rising pressure. For the second case the quantity dp/dT, as can be seen from Eq. (5.124),
happens to be negative, i.e. the fusion point lowers with rising pressure.
Thus, for some substances (water, for instance) the slope of the melting
boundary on the p-T diagram is negative (see Fig. 5.3).
The solid-vapor phase change
When applied to a solid-vapor phase change, Eq. (5.107) takes the
following form:
where L
is the heat of sublimation, vv the specific volume of vapor on the sublimation
line, and vs
is the specific volume of the solid.
Since sublimation usually takes place at low pressures (below the pressure
at the triple point), the specific volume of the forming vapor on the sublimation
line is several orders of magnitude greater than the specific volume of the
solid phase. Therefore, in accordance with Eq. (5.125), for the solid-vapor
phase change the quantity dp/dT
is greater than zero, which means that the slope of the sublimation
line in the p-T diagram is positive.
It is clear that in the process of sublimation vy > vs and the value vs in Eq. (5.125) can be
ignored. The specific volume of vapor on the sublimation line is described very
accurately by Clapeyron's equation
and Eq.
(5.125) takes the form
Knowing the temperature dependence for the heat of sublimation, we can
solve Eq. (5.126).
In conclusion, one more interesting application of the Clausius-Clapeyron
equation will be indicated. As was already mentioned in Sec. 3.4, of great
importance is the introduction of corrections to any empirical (practical)
temperature scale so as to reduce this scale to the thermodynamic temperature
scale, i.e. to establish a thermodynamic temperature scale based on a given
concrete empirical temperature scale (for instance, on that of a gas
thermometer). The equation for the corrections to the International Temperature
Scale, used to convert it into the thermodynamic scale, was given in Chapter 3.
But how can these corrections be determined? These corrections, i.e. the
difference between the temperatures on the thermodynamic, T, and empirical, T*, scales, or, in other words, the
dependence T = f (T*),
can be determined by various methods, one of which is based on the Clausius-Clapeyron
equation.
As was already mentioned repeatedly, the thermodynamic temperature is
present in all thermodynamic relationships, including the Clausius-Clapeyron equation
(5.108), which, when applied to the liquid-vapor phase change, takes the
following form:
If the values of v', v"
and r are determined experimentally, Eq. (5.108a) can obviously
be used to calculate dT/dp.
On the other hand, if we have experimental data on the dependence of the
saturation pressure ps on temperature (where temperature
measurements are taken with the aid of a thermometer graduated according to the
empirical scale, i.e. T* is measured), the magnitude of the derivative dT*/dp can be calculated by means
of graphical or numerical methods.
The value of dT/dp,
calculated from Eq. (5.108a), is evidently related with dT*/dp via the relationship
Substituting the value of dT/dp from relation (5.108a), we obtain:
Integrating this relationship, we have:
whence
Thus, if some thermodynamic-scale temperature T1 corresponding to the temperature T*, is known, then, having experimental
data on v', v", r
and p in the temperature interval from
[1] The index
s will always refer to values on the
saturation line and the indexes prime and double prime, respectively, to the liquid and vapor in the state of
saturation.
[2] For
greater detail on the temperature dependence of r, see Sec. 6.6.
[3] The independent consideration of the quantities (u" - u') and p (v" - v') is, strictly speaking, conventional to a certain degree, since
the breakdown of associations is intimately associated with an increase in the
specific volume of a substance.